Comments on: Ugandan kill-the-gays bill part 4: HIV-AIDS statistics in Uganda http://beingthechangeiwishtosee.com/1689/ugandan-kill-the-gays-bill-part-4-hiv-aids-statistics-in-uganda/ One Person Can Make a Difference Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:19:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Pointer Men's Basketball http://beingthechangeiwishtosee.com/1689/ugandan-kill-the-gays-bill-part-4-hiv-aids-statistics-in-uganda/comment-page-1/#comment-2393 Pointer Men's Basketball Fri, 29 Oct 2010 23:00:51 +0000 http://beingthechangeiwishtosee.com/?p=1689#comment-2393 Best you could make changes to the post subject title Ugandan kill-the-gays bill part 4: HIV-AIDS statistics in Uganda » Being the Change I Wish to See to more catching for your webpage you write. I loved the post nevertheless. Best you could make changes to the post subject title Ugandan kill-the-gays bill part 4: HIV-AIDS statistics in Uganda » Being the Change I Wish to See to more catching for your webpage you write. I loved the post nevertheless.

]]> By: Ugandan kill-the-gays bill part 14: Obama speaks of Ugandan bill at U.S. Family National Prayer Breakfast » Being the Change I Wish to See http://beingthechangeiwishtosee.com/1689/ugandan-kill-the-gays-bill-part-4-hiv-aids-statistics-in-uganda/comment-page-1/#comment-1192 Ugandan kill-the-gays bill part 14: Obama speaks of Ugandan bill at U.S. Family National Prayer Breakfast » Being the Change I Wish to See Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:52:58 +0000 http://beingthechangeiwishtosee.com/?p=1689#comment-1192 [...] links:Part 1: Born in the USAPart 2: Horrific DetailsPart 3: American Silence is Deafening Part 4: HIV-AIDS Statistics in UgandaPart 5: State Dept Must Make US Policy ClearPart 6: Richard Cohen and debunking gay curePart 7: [...] [...] links:Part 1: Born in the USAPart 2: Horrific DetailsPart 3: American Silence is Deafening Part 4: HIV-AIDS Statistics in UgandaPart 5: State Dept Must Make US Policy ClearPart 6: Richard Cohen and debunking gay curePart 7: [...]

]]> By: Amy LeForge http://beingthechangeiwishtosee.com/1689/ugandan-kill-the-gays-bill-part-4-hiv-aids-statistics-in-uganda/comment-page-1/#comment-1104 Amy LeForge Mon, 29 Mar 2010 04:28:06 +0000 http://beingthechangeiwishtosee.com/?p=1689#comment-1104 I've never heard of Scott Lively, but then I don't pay much attention to people who wind up at the forefront of large groups. I don't trust 'em. I do question your claim about pedophiles being almost exclusively heterosexual...that's not in line with other reports I've read over the years. Again, this is mainly casual reading not actual study. I would be interested in the study that provided that conclusion. The whole membership in a group issue can be difficult for people on both sides. My church actually left its founding denomination over membership definitions (didn't have anything to do with homosexuality) so I'm familiar with exactly how difficult it can get. Private groups have the right to define who can and cannot be a member. If I set a definition of membership for my group I will by default be excluding some people. Does that make me anti-them? Not necessarily. I find it sad that Christians take such a rap for being anti- this or that, when so many other groups also have membership definitions that naturally exclude large numbers of people. I can't be a member of the JayCees. I'm too old. Can't be a Muslim. I'm Christian. Can't be a Jew, or a Knight of Columbus, or a Veteran of Foreign Wars, or....you get the picture. Does that make those groups anti-me? No. I just don't fit their definition or membership requirements. Do I go around complaining about it? No. I just find groups that work for me and with me, then I live and let live. .-= Amy LeForge´s last blog ..<a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/EarnestParenting/~3/E-aQ4yeqiNk/" rel="nofollow">FFYF: Forgetfulness Edition</a> =-. I’ve never heard of Scott Lively, but then I don’t pay much attention to people who wind up at the forefront of large groups. I don’t trust ‘em.

I do question your claim about pedophiles being almost exclusively heterosexual…that’s not in line with other reports I’ve read over the years. Again, this is mainly casual reading not actual study. I would be interested in the study that provided that conclusion.

The whole membership in a group issue can be difficult for people on both sides. My church actually left its founding denomination over membership definitions (didn’t have anything to do with homosexuality) so I’m familiar with exactly how difficult it can get.

Private groups have the right to define who can and cannot be a member. If I set a definition of membership for my group I will by default be excluding some people. Does that make me anti-them? Not necessarily.

I find it sad that Christians take such a rap for being anti- this or that, when so many other groups also have membership definitions that naturally exclude large numbers of people. I can’t be a member of the JayCees. I’m too old. Can’t be a Muslim. I’m Christian. Can’t be a Jew, or a Knight of Columbus, or a Veteran of Foreign Wars, or….you get the picture. Does that make those groups anti-me? No. I just don’t fit their definition or membership requirements. Do I go around complaining about it? No. I just find groups that work for me and with me, then I live and let live.
.-= Amy LeForge´s last blog ..FFYF: Forgetfulness Edition =-.

]]>